The next decade of brain science has the potential to reshape the human experience.
If we are passive, the coming brain revolution will either fall short of its potential or drift towards negative outcomes. With BrainMind’s vision to form a new vital connective tissue between the lab and society, our responsible innovation initiative considers how to encourage decision-making that maximizes the potential benefits and minimizes the unintended hazards that accompany rapid innovations in brain science.
Want to Learn More?
Neuroethics Education
Neuroethics examines the ethical, legal, and social impacts of neuroscience advancements. As part of BrainMind’s Neuroethics Initiative, we've developed a free educational hub focused on the field's significance for the future of neuroscience.
Click on the picture to the left or the button above to start on your neuroethics education journey.
Neuroethics Toolkit
Explore five essential tools designed to guide startups in ethical neuroinnovation. These resources provide practical strategies to address the unique ethical challenges in the rapidly evolving field of neuroscience.
Click on the picture to the left or the button above to learn more.
ASILOMAR FOR THE BRAIN AND MIND
In 2025, BrainMind will convene a sector-defining summit: "Asilomar for the Brain and Mind." This global, multi-sectoral meeting will focus on the research, development, distribution, and use of near-term innovations in brain science. Regulation will never keep pace with technological innovation. We need to build neuroethics into the culture. Influential leaders across brain science sectors must come together to adopt unified ethical principles and practical tools for responsible neuroinnovation.
This meeting will not reinvent the wheel. Neuroethics principles and guidelines have already been developed in committee meetings internationally (US BRAIN Initiative, OECD, IEEE, GNS, others) but most of the people translating ideas out of the lab are either unaware of these guidelines and standards or don’t know how to use them in their day-to-day decision-making. Asilomar will catalyze adoption of practical tools and methods to navigate ethical questions throughout the innovation process.
Examples of practical neuroethics tools to be disseminated at Asilomar:
“Points to Consider” questionnaire for funders to screen candidate companies and researchers
Practical benchmarks for entrepreneurs and scientists such as bylaws for responsible neurotechnology companies, and codes of ethics created by exemplar labs, funds, and companies
Other implementable frameworks such as a Neuroscience ESG
PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT
The Asilomar conference will include deep engagement with private sector stakeholders, including investors, entrepreneurs, philanthropic organizations, and life science and tech leaders. Tremendous private and corporate investments have been directed into brain research in recent years and commercialization of brain technologies will have an unprecedented influence on individual lives and societies.
BrainMind is uniquely suited for a convening role at Asilomar because of our capacity to engage leaders in the private sector. Our 3,000-member community includes individuals at the highest reaches of their respective industries: Midas list investors, widely revered technology entrepreneurs, past and future Nobel laureates. These leaders are making strategic decisions at the most influential institutions in the world. BrainMind has already organized several world class Summits since 2018, at Stanford, MIT, and at the OECD headquarters in Paris.
PLANNING and ADVISORY MEETINGS
SPECIAL BREAKOUT SESSION AT THE BRAINMIND SPECIAL FORUM ON NEUROMODULATION, BCI, AND AI 2024
The First Brain Data Law Just Passed. What Do You Need to Know – and What’s Next?
It is essential that leaders in neurotechnology—companies, investors, scientists, and more—know about and shape public policy and industry standards. Dr. Rafael Yuste, along with Jamie Daves, came together for a behind-the-scenes briefing on the latest developments in U.S. and global regulation and industry practices. The session covered the precedent-setting Colorado neurotech legislation and highlighted what was expected next in the U.S. and worldwide. Dr. Karen Rommelfanger moderated an interactive discussion on strategies stakeholders could use to navigate the emerging regulatory and industry environments, advance innovation, and foster public trust. Participants were encouraged to pose questions, share experiences, and engage in debate. The session provided a critical opportunity for stakeholders to learn more and get involved in determining what would come next.
ETHICS AND BRAIN SCIENCE SUNSET TEA PARTY 2024
Co-hosted with UNESCO and the MIT Media Lab
The purpose of this gathering was to discuss the recent UNESCO draft for a global standard on the Ethics of Neurotechnology, providing feedback and insight that was then used to guide the final draft. Nataliya Kosmyna, Ph.D, Expert Group Member, UNESCO Neuroethics, Research Scientist at MIT Media Lab, led the discussions. This was a unique experience to listen to our community and gather individual voices to help establish comprehensive guidelines and protocols globally.
Before convening, participants were asked to read the UNESCO draft for a global standard on the Ethics of Neurotechnology, and come prepared to discuss and lend their unique opinion. Diverse stakeholders were gathered, from students to entrepreneurs to investors, in order to gather more comprehensive feedback and insights.
GLOBAL ADVISORY MEETING 2022: NEUROETHICS IMPLEMENTATION IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR
Co-organised with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
In collaboration with the OECD, BrainMind convened 30 interdisciplinary leaders in Paris to advise on securing the role of neuroethics in the future of neuroscience research and innovation. This gathering focused on the implementation of neuroethics frameworks across academia, entrepreneurship, public policy, and investing. The OECD Recommendation on Responsible Innovation in Neurotechnology served as a jumping-off point for the discussion.
This advisory meeting informed implementation efforts of neuroethics softlaw guidance, specifically highlighting concrete roles and activities of different actors. Meeting participants also helped to shape the agenda for the larger (tentatively 250 person) interdisciplinary summit to be convened by BrainMind and a number of international collaborators at the Asilomar California Conference Grounds in 2023. Convening key actors from the private sector, this effort identified best practices for implementing neuroethical inquiry toward advancing the most powerful neuroscience and neurotechnology outcomes for society.
BrainMind-OECD Neuroethics Advisory Committee
VIRTUAL ADVISORY MEETINGS (2021)
In 2021 and into 2022, BrainMind has convened sector-specific advisory meetings on practical neuroethics engagement in a virtual setting. These sessions helped us to better understand the incentives driving decision-making by stakeholders across neuro-innovation.
BrainMind has been building an active forum for deep discussion on responsible innovation across traditionally siloed disciplines, uniquely connecting neuroethicists with neuroscientists, policymakers, and private sector stakeholders to an unrivaled degree. An immediate outcome has been increased sense of community and enthusiasm for neuroethics amongst our stakeholders, not to mention increased momentum and enthusiasm for an Asilomar-style summit. As we prepare to host “Asilomar for the Brain and Mind,” we are building clear plans for engagement and simultaneously attracting aspirational participants to join the initiative.
ADVISORS and CONTRIBUTORS
Academia
Steven Hyman, PhD, Harvard University, Broad Institute, (Chair)
Ed Boyden, PhD, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Hillel Braude, MBBCH,PhD, The Mifne Center, Israel
Hervé Chneiweiss, MD, PhD, Sorbonne Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Jennifer Chandler, University of Ottawa
Martha Farah, PhD, University of Pennsylvania
Nita Farahany, JD, PhD, Duke University
Calvin Ho, JSD, National University of Singapore
Marcello Ienca, PhD, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne
Gary Marchant, PhD, JD, Arizona State University
Bianca Jones Marlin, PhD, Columbia University
Jonathan D. Moreno, PhD, University of Pennsylvania
Eisuke Nakawaza, PhD, University of Tokyo
Sebastian Pfotenhauer, PhD, Technical University of Munich
Laura Roberts, MD, Stanford University
Jacob T. Robinson, PhD, Rice University; IEEE Brain
Jane Roskams, PhD, University of Washington & University of British Columbia, CONP, INCF
Julian Savelescue, PhD, Oxford
Nanthia Suthana, PhD, UCLA
Jie Yin, MD, PhD, Fudan University
Jialin Zheng, MD, Tongji University in Shanghai & UNMC
Policy
Bojana Bellamy, JD, LLM, Centre for Information Policy Leadership
Ricardo Chavarriaga, IEEE, CLAIRE
Peggy Hicks, JD, UN Human Rights Office
Thomas R. Insel, MD, former NIMH, Humanest
Jesse Isaacman-Beck, National Institutes of Health
Lyric Jorgenson, PhD, National Institutes of Health
Laura Kreiling, PhD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Myong Hwa Lee, PhD, Office of National R&D Research, South Korea
Pascal Maigné, PhD, Ministry of Higher Education and Research, France
Eric M. Meslin, PhD, Council of Canadian Academies
Matt Perrault, JD, former Facebook, Duke Science and Society
Khara Ramos, PhD, Dana Foundation, NINDS/NIH; BRAIN Initiative Neuroethics Working Group
Philip Rubin, PhD, Haskins Laboratories
Wendell Wallach, PhD, Yale University
David Winickoff, JD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Philanthropy
Cara Altimus, PhD, Milken Institute
Christian Braemer, Benefunder
Amy Bernard, PhD, Kavli Foundation
Caroline Montojo, PhD, Dana Foundation
Andrew Welchman, PhD, (former) Wellcome Trust
Gary Wilson, PhD, Gatsby Charitable Foundation
Gwill York, MBA, One Mind, Museum of Sciences Boston
Investing
Christian Angermeyer, Apeiron Investment Group
Wesley Chan, FPV Ventures
Max de Vere, MMath, re.Mind Capital
Juan Enriquez, MBA, Excel Venture Management
Arvind Gupta, Indiebio, Mayfield
Ken Howery, Founders Fund, PayPal
Bradley Horowitz, Google, Angel investor
Reid Hoffman, Greylock Partners
Raaid Hossain, Pay it Forward
Steven Jacobs, MS, Lakestar
Amy Kruse, PhD, Prime Movers Lab
Sean O’Sullivan, MFA, SOSV
Alan MacIntosh, Real Ventures
Bob Nelson, MBA, Arch Ventures
Miri Polachek, MBA, Quadrascope Fund (former Joy Ventures)
Bryan Roberts, PhD, Venrock
Maryanna Senko, PhD, Future Ventures
Bo Shao, MBA, Evolve Ventures and Foundation
Denmasrk West, MBA, Connectivity Ventures
Sean White, PhD, Braingels; Former Chief R&D Officer, Mozilla
Gwill York, MBA, Lighthouse Capital Partners, Partners Healthcare, OneMind
Industry
John Abele, Boston Scientific
Matt Botvinick, MD, PhD, Deepmind
Bill Casebeer, PhD, Riverside Research
Deborah Dunsire, MD, Lundbeck
Philip Nelson, PhD, Google Research
Jeffrey Rogers, PhD, IBM Research
Danielle Schlosser, PhD, (former) Verily, Compass Pathways
Steph Thacker, PhD, Meta
Entrepreneurship
Matt Angle, PhD, Paradromics
Ariel Garten, InteraXon/Muse
Adam Gazzaley, PhD, Akili, Jazz, Neuroscape
Séverine Gisin, MS, IDUN Technologies
George Goldsmith, Compass Pathways
Ana Maiques, MBA, Neuroelectrics
Michael McCullough, MD, BrainMind
Tim Mullen, PhD, Intheon
Brian Murphy, PhD, Cumulus Neuroscience
Thomas Reardon, PhD, Meta (former Ctrl-labs)
Erik Rehn, MS, Flow Neuroscience
Dan Rizzuto, PhD, Nia Therapeutics
Philip Sabes, PhD, Neuralink (now Starfish Neuro)
Stephen Kennedy Smith, Pear Therapeutics
Quentin Soulet de Brugiere, PhD, Dreem
FIRST BRAINMIND NEUROETHICS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING (2020)
This meeting took place on Feb 27-29, 2020 in Durham, NC. The summit was chaired by Dr. Steven Hyman, co-hosted with Dr. Nita Farahany at the Duke Initiative for Science & Society, and was made possible by sponsorship from The Kavli Foundation and the Charles A. Dana Foundation.
A small group of interdisciplinary leaders anchored this important national advisory committee, which will help to set the agenda for the larger (tentatively 250 person) international, interdisciplinary summit to be convened at the Asilomar Conference Grounds in 2021. This effort differs from other neuroethics summits by engaging more deeply with representatives from the private sector, including entrepreneurs, investors, and executives from the technology and life science industries.
Participants in the first advisory committee meeting included leaders from the NIH/NINDS, the US BRAIN Initiative, the International Neuroethics Society, the International Brain Initiative, and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). It is particularly timely to formulate the role of neuroethics in the future of neurotechnology. The importance of such deliberations and the are highlighted by new investments in brain projects across the world, a burgeoning neurotechnology industry, and other fast-moving sources of innovation. It is a critical time for a diverse community to discuss areas in neuroscience in most in need of new intellectual energy and financial support, principles for interactions with industry, and other issues that will guide the development of this vibrant and influential field.
First Neuroethics Advisory Committee
Steven E. Hyman, MD Committee Chair
Nita Farahany, PhD, JD Committee Co-host
PURPOSE
The goal of this advisory committee meeting was to begin designing the agenda for BrainMind’s global neuroethics summit focused on the research, development, distribution, and use of existing and near-term innovations in brain science, to be convened at the Asilomar Conference Grounds in California. With this summit, we envision the collaborative creation of ethics guidance for members of the BrainMind ecosystem and its partners, including neuroscientists (basic to clinical), entrepreneurs, investors, philanthropists, major industry stakeholders, and policymakers. Over the 1.5-day meeting, we asked this group to help identify the most important and practically relevant topics for discussion within neuroethics, to suggest individuals and organizations to be included in the summit and further planning efforts, and to help think through how to implement the resulting output in the real world. The findings from this meeting has been collated into a report that will guide future advisory sessions with key international and business stakeholders.
TOPICS
Topics of discussion for the BrainMind Neuroethics Summit will be focused on practical guidelines around neurotechnology and science likely to significantly impact human beings in the next ten years. In the effort to advance neuroscience for the benefit of humanity, we will look closely at the intersections among neuroscience, technology, brains, and minds with respect to such areas as memory and memory editing, narrative identity, psychological continuity, agency, moral responsibility and legal culpability, brain computer interfaces, mind-reading, embryo selection and genome editing for cognitive ability or other mental traits, boundaries between normal variation and mental illness, and ethical considerations for both philanthropic and commercial investment in research that touches these neuroethical issues.
OUR APPROACH
Experts have suggested that the neuroscience community (and scientists in general) tend to associate the term “ethics” with restrictive regulatory oversight, leading to avoidance of the subject. BrainMind’s neuroethics initiative will not focus on restricting innovation, nor will it revisit long-discussed bioethics issues concerning the brain, such as nonhuman primate research limitations and protections for human subjects. The health of the intellectual endeavor depends upon taking special care with terms like “governance” as this type of language tends to alienate the groups we hope to engage. Regulatory matters have been and continue to be ably handled by bioethicists and IRBs in consultation with experts such as those serving on our national advisory board.
OUTCOMES
The vision of the BrainMind neuroethics initiative is to create an active forum for deep discussion on neuroethics across traditionally siloed disciplines, connecting neuroethicists with neuroscientists, policymakers, and private sector stakeholders, as well as philanthropists and the broader community. Small multi-sectoral advisory meetings will build trust and a shared vocabulary across professional communities. This collaborative discourse will empower BrainMind ecosystem members who have little exposure to neuroethics to engage with their work with a healthy understanding of its potential impact on society.
A planned virtual roundtable series to follow the Advisory Committee meeting in 2020 will yield significant insights that will shape the agenda for the large Asilomar Summit.
SUPPORTERS
The BrainMind National Neuroethics Advisory Committee Meeting was made possible with sponsorship from The Kavli Foundation and the Charles A. Dana Foundation, with co-hosting support from the Duke Initiative for Science and Society.